- Deployment and Families
- "If a man has recently married, he must not be sent
to war of have any other duty laid on him. For one year he is
to be free to stay at home and bring happiness to the wife he
has married." Deuteronomy 24:5
-
-
- "The sight of suitcases bothers me a lot, even now.
I remember my father's green bags, all packed and ready to go...."
- Military Brats: Legacies of Childhood inside the Fortress
- by Wertsch, ME (1991) Harmony Books, New York
-
- By the 1980's over half of all service members were married
- "The military family has an impact on the state of readiness
of our armed forces , and this is not indirect, but rather a
direct influence."
- ADM Lando Vech
- Spouse attitudes and functioning are related to officers'
job performance and reenlistment decisions, servicemen's job
satisfaction.
- Military separation linked to spouse loneliness, depression,
anxiety, anger, physical illness.
-
- Sea duty linked to servicemen's anxiety, guilt, and depression.
- Hill, R. (1949) Families under stress. New York: Harper
and Row
- ABCX family crisis model:
- Stressful event= A
- in interaction with:
- Adaptational resources= B
- Perception or definition of the event= C
- Results in:
- Intensity and characteristics of the family's crisis response=
X
-
- 1992 DOD survey of 97,000 active duty (60,000 respondents):
-
- 69% had spouse or dependent
- 76.5% of those with spouse or dependent reported a separation
within the past year:
- 27.3 % reported a separation of 1-2 months
- 26.1% reported a separation of 3-6 months
- 16.2 % reported a separation of 7-12 months
- Navy E1-E4: average separation was 4.9 months
- AF E1-E4: average separation 1.7 months
-
- Highest risk of separation from family members:
- Navy
- E1-E4
- male
- single parent
-
- Among single parents
- 39% of females had no deployment
- 19% of males had no deployment
-
-
- Primary concerns:
- Family safety in event of war- 31% M>F
- Family safety in community- 31% M>F
- Children's health and well-being- 29% F>M
- Money to pay bills- 27% F>M
- Car or household repairs- 23% M>F
-
- Greatest worries:
- enlisted>officers
- E5-6 highest worry
- Navy and Marines > Army and AF
- junior ranks>senior ranks
-
- Wills-
- 46% had wills
- 15% of Navy E1-E4's
- AF officers less likely than other services
- POA's-
- 36% had POA's
- AF officers less likely than other services
- Family Care Plans-
- 39% of those required had FCP's
-
- Confidence in child care arrangements-
- 72% had confidence for short term emergency
- 69% for long term
- Lowest confidence among
- E1-E4
- Marines
- Navy
-
- Satisfaction with Child Care during Recent Separation and
Deployment
- 78%
- decreased with lower rank
-
- Types of Individual and Family Problems that Delayed the
Military Member's Ability to Respond to Recall/Alert (during
the past year)
- 60% reported no problems:
- 34% of those alerted reported at least one problem:
- 37% Dependent care enlisted(esp. E5-6) > officers
- females > males (>2:1)
- 26% Difficult to reach by Telephone esp. E1-E4
- 25% Transportation arrangements esp. E1-E4
- 21% Distance to duty station
- 19% Attending school
-
- Stress and coping Among Army wives During Operation Desert
Shield and Desert Storm
- Rosen LN, Westhuis DJ, Teitelbaum JM
- Dept. of Military Psychiatry, WRAMC
-
- Spouses with difficulty coping:
- tended to be younger, though age was not a good predictor
- soldier's rank was generally lower, though a weak factor
- employed
- Many junior enlisted spouses moved to be with family
-
- Prior studies: Largest support comes from family, neighbors,
friends
- Spouse Support During Peacekeeping Missions: Lessons Learned
from Operation Restore Hope
- Bell, DB US Army Research Institute 1993
-
- 10th Mountain Division (Ft. Drum)(surveyed summer of 1993)
- ORH vs. ODS/S
- reported greater support
- and greater satisfaction with formal support services
- just as likely to have to say multiple goodbyes (stressful)
- fewer problems with :
- finances
- chores
- employment
- health care of family
- loneliness
- stress of reunion
-
- ORH Deployed Spouse vs. Non deployed spouse
- greater use of on-post support services
- greater use of informal support
- no difference in marital satisfaction or support of soldier's
career
-
- Junior enlisted spouses:
- most stress
- less satisfaction with formal support
- fewer family strengths
- higher stress during reunion
-
- The Effects of Deployment on Navy Personnel and their
Spouses,
- Archer RP, Cauthorne CV:
- Questionnaires returned by to 399 (of 800) Navy personnel,
53.8% were married (215 Spouses returned questionnaire)
- 16% officers, 84% enlisted;
- Married personnel- less enjoyment but less emotional distress
during deployment
-
- Reasons deployment is stressful:
- originates external to the family unit;
- directly impacts all family members
- variable duration
- unpredictability of onset and duration
- beyond family member control
- uncertain risk= uncertain future
- alterations in family authority structure and independence
-
- Predictors of poor family response to deployment:
- family dysfunction
- poor emotional expressiveness
- conflict
- emphasis on rigid, authoritarian control
- poor coping skills
- fewer resources
- individual service member:
- attitude
- perception of job performance
- overall stress in past year
- Nelson J, Hagedorn, ME: Rhythms of War: Activation Experiences
during the Persian Gulf War, Military Medicine, Vol. 162,
pp 233-239 April 1997
- Interviews of 59 reservists, mostly aeromedical evac
personnel
-
- Family support systems:
- helpful
- provided some financial support
- varying expectations (incl. babysitting, fixing the car)
- Problems:
- lack of knowledge of resources
- often geographically distant
- lack of info for families
- lack of family education during mobilization
- not enough trained people
-
- "...fragmentation of unit personnel led to personal
and professional unpreparedness and added stress."
- staying connected with other unit members was important
-
- financial difficulties were pervasive
- included problems with delay in activation of military pay
and benefits
- emotional fluctuations while awaiting "the call"
-
- family unpreparedness
- "They did not prepare their families or spouses [for
their] going to war. People didn't know how to do checking accounts,
change tires... the military needs to learn to teach military
members to teach their families... to keep them more involved.
Many of them left their spouses hanging out in the breeze."
-
- "...relationships within the family support network
needed to form prior to activation, mobilization, and deployment
of military personnel."
- new relationships were effective, but did not persist after
redeployment
-
- Technology
- compulsion for instantaneous news
- phenomenon of watching the news as it happened to you.
-
- Children:
- fear of death of parent
- disciplinary problems if the source of discipline deployed
- teasing and harassment by peers
- loneliness
- difficulties enhanced by lack of a parent to confide in
- or fear of upsetting the parent at home
- acting out
- "No matter how well you think you prepare children,
you are never sure how much they understand."
-
- Transmission of formal information about deployed service
members was felt to be inadequate, and informal networks developed.
- especially problematic if personnel are put into another
unit, e.g. activated reservists, PROFIS fillers, etc.,
-
- Reassimilation surprisingly difficult
- quick return
- hasty out processing
- families have new roles and skills